• 观看记录
    • 关注公众号观影不迷路

    电影 关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过

    关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过

    影片信息

    • 片名:关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
    • 状态:HD
    • 主演:未知
    • 导演:居伊·德波/
    • 年份:1959
    • 地区:法国
    • 类型:剧情/
    • 时长:内详
    • 上映:未知
    • 语言:法语
    • 更新:2024-10-19 11:40
    • 简介:  Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
    • 关注公众号观影不迷路

    • 扫一扫用手机访问

     立即播放  高清②

    选择来源

    • 高清①
    • 高清②
    1.0
    网友评分
    • 很差
    • 较差
    • 还行
    • 推荐
    • 力荐
    176次评分
    1.0
    网友评分
    • 很差
    • 较差
    • 还行
    • 推荐
    • 力荐
    176次评分
    给影片打分 《关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过》
    • 很差
    • 较差
    • 还行
    • 推荐
    • 力荐
    我也要给影片打分

    扫一扫用手机访问

    首页 电影 关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过

    播放列表

     当前资源来源高清② - 在线播放,无需安装播放器
     倒序

    剧情简介

      Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

    为你推荐

     换一换
    • HD
      3.0 永野芽郁/高桥文哉/铃木仁/平祐奈/前田旺志郎/志田彩良/白鸟玉季/斋藤润/江口洋介/
    • HD
      6.0 修睿/杜玉明/衣云鹤/孙蛟龙/耿一正/唐鉴军/高旻睿/张百乔/
    • HD
      5.0 京本大我/古川琴音/横田真悠/三浦獠太/坂口涼太郎/皆川猿时/西田尚美/尾美利德/
    • HD
      5.0 韩韶禧/韩海印/
    • HD
      6.0 虞祎杰/程启蒙/张小帅/
    • HD中字
      7.0 莱西·沙伯特/达斯汀·米利甘/凯蒂·米克松/罗伦·荷莉/克里斯尔·斯塔休斯/乔·洛·特鲁格里奥/克雷格·罗宾森/Sherry Miller/Sarah DeSouza-Coelho/索菲娅·韦伯斯特/Bobby Daniels/Jennie Esnard/Christine Okuda Hara/Janice Israeloff/
    • HD
      5.0 佐伊·索尔达娜/赛琳娜·戈麦斯/卡拉·索菲娅·加斯科恩/阿德里安娜·帕兹/埃德加·拉米雷兹/马克·伊瓦涅/Eduardo Aladro/Emiliano Edmundo Hasan Jalil/Gaël Murgia-Fur/Tirso Pietriga/Xiomara Melissa Ahumada Quito/Magali Brito/Jarib dit Javier Zagoya Montiel/Sébastien Fruit/Alejandra Reyes/安娜贝尔·洛佩斯/Daniel Vela/
    • HD
      9.0 周杰伦/桂纶镁/黄秋生/曾恺玹/苏明明/黄俊郎/宋健彰/詹宇豪/张杰/钟瑶/张训玮/
    • HD国语
      4.0 李抒航/史可/李子雄/郑钧颢/卢卓婕/穆立新/倪土/陈宇星/
    • HD中字
      4.0 爱丽森·布里/爱丽丝·伊芙/约翰·塞纳/克里斯蒂安·史莱特/马尔顿·索克斯/胡安·巴勃罗·拉瓦/朱莉安娜·亚历山大/茉莉·麦克凯恩/丹尼尔·托罗/菲奥娜·霍西/毛里西奥·丘雅/塞巴斯蒂安·埃斯拉瓦/罗伯托·卡诺/迭戈·巴斯克斯/尼尔森·卡马约/马特·穆迪/梅莉达·萨维兹/
    • HD
      1.0 赵丹/夏天/高正/韩非/阳华/梁山/谭宁邦/李镛/邓楠/蒋锐/温锡莹/秦怡/魏立达/蓝谷/高博/钱千里/
    • HD
      10.0 周璇/赵丹/魏鹤龄/钱千里/
    • HD
      5.0 谢芳/康泰/于洋/秦怡/于是之/秦文/葛存壮/赵联/张逸生/赵玉嵘/韩焱/乌晨曦/罗锦鳞/孙凤琴/张亮/曹增银/邵华/林东升/史弘/王人美/李雨农/黄菲/赵子岳/李建国/杜德夫/
    • HD
      4.0 郑佩佩/何莉莉/岳华/丁红/井淼/
    • HD
      9.0 上官云珠/蓝马/齐衡/吴茵/沈扬/高正/
    • HD
      2.0 赵丹/上官云珠/孙道临/李天济/黄宗英/魏鹤龄/吴茵/王蓓/李保罗/奇梦石/王露露/田广才/傅伯棠/葛梅强/程漠/邱奂/张立德/何剑飞/苗祝三/石灵/
    • HD
      8.0 阮玲玉/郑君里/
    • HD
      9.0 王人美/韩兰根/袁丛美/裘逸苇/罗朋/
    • HD
      1.0 蔡元元/蔡安安/舒适/蒋锐/马立/李保罗/郑建民/李镛/冯笑/刘非/周伯勋/田陇/周志峰/程之/于明德/王岚/曹铎/杨公敏/
    • HD
      8.0 杨丽坤/莫梓江/孙静贞/谭尧中/王苏娅/朱一锦/
    • HD
      3.0 凯瑞-安·莫斯/道格拉斯·史密斯/弗兰克·格里罗/
    • HD中字
      1.0 亚当·德赖弗/吉安卡罗·埃斯波西托/娜塔莉·伊曼纽尔/奥布瑞·普拉扎/希亚·拉博夫/达斯汀·霍夫曼/乔恩·沃伊特/劳伦斯·菲什伯恩/塔莉娅·夏尔/詹姆斯·瑞马尔/詹森·舒瓦兹曼/D·B·斯威尼/凯瑟琳·亨特/克洛伊·菲内曼/巴萨扎·盖提/索尼娅·阿马尔/夏洛林·阿莫亚/格蕾丝·万德沃尔/查理·塔尔伯特/伊莎贝尔·库斯曼/
    • HD
      1.0 内扎特·伊什莱尔/伊利亚达·阿克迪肯/塞泽尔·阿里凯/Gurur Cicekoglu/塞纳伊·古勒/埃斯·伊尔特姆/蕾扎.柯卓奥古鲁/哈扎·苏巴西/阿坦·安古鲁/Cem Uslu/卡迪尔·瑟米克/
    • HD
      3.0 罗立群/尚娜/刘金/赵智妍/李艾笑/
    • HD
      8.0 吉田伶香/バーンズ勇気/伊泽彩织/六平直政/
    • HD
      10.0 金俊亨/元道贤/
    • 更新至第01集
      7.0 娜奥米·斯科特/凯尔·加尔纳/德鲁·巴里摩尔/罗丝玛丽·德薇特/卢卡斯·盖奇/迪兰·格鲁拉/彼得·雅各布森/雷·尼科尔森/劳尔·卡斯提洛/达芙妮·泽利/迈尔斯·古铁雷斯-赖利/Zebedee Row/Delphi Harrington/Micaela Lamas/David Peter White/
    • HD国语
      5.0 文松/明星/杜建桥/刘美钰/姚诺/闫露娢/
    • HD国语
      8.0 张智尧/
    • HD国语
      4.0 小沙兜/

    最新资讯

    更多

    评论

    共 0 条评论